Jump to content

Vintage Diamond ring from mother


Isobelxx
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hiya, nice to meet you all! Looking for some advice on this ring that was given to me by my mother. She got it from an antiques dealer many years ago. It’s just been stored away in a jewellery box for years since and she never wore it, she has now gave it to me. I’m trying to find out more about it, like how old it is and what the carat weight would be. Here are the details I know so far. It has a very high unusual setting.

7mm across and 4mm depth diamond.

18k white gold and has 2 hallmarks on outer band.

any advice info is muchly appreciated x

 

 

 

 

7F5539C5-358F-4CAF-B712-76EB17281CFE.jpeg

42A87E70-FF4C-4F78-A611-BAF7FE3E8F75.jpeg

ED375A72-E6CE-4B28-989D-4A5B96DF8E30.jpeg

9C25B404-F44D-44CE-B128-4DE0ABB90854.jpeg

BA462BA1-F608-4598-BC31-AA9673ED35D6.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to DiamondReview!

The ring has French hallmarks for 18 kt gold, and that design (which I call "radiator fins", but I suppose it's meant to look like a sun's rays) was popular between the end of the 1920s and the 1940s. The stone is also an old(ish) cut, probably from the 1920-1940 period as well (high crown, small table, short lower girdle facets, small culet). Unfortunately I know of no systematic report of French makers marks, so who or what stands for "GXS" (?) remains a mystery.

The carat weight of the stone is very difficult to determine from photos; generally the setting was used to make smaller stones (0.25 - 0.40 ct) look larger by having light reflect off the metal, so I would guess it's roughly of that size. It could be bigger, though - it looks larger on your hand in the video, but perhaps you have very slim fingers. If you can take a measurement of the diameter I may be a little more precise.

Edited by davidelevi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I would say "around 1 ct"; probably over.

A well-cut modern 1 ct round brilliant is around 6.45 - 6.55 mm, and older cut stones tend to be heavier for the same diameter. A "7 mm" modern stone (precisely measured) would be probably closer to 1.25 - 1.30 ct, so if this is actually 7.00 mm (measured say with a pair of precision calipers, if not a diamond gauge) it could be as much as 1.40 ct. The only way of knowing for sure is to unset the diamond and put it on jeweller's scales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could be, though I suspect it would be called "transitional" or "circular brilliant" by GIA.

GIA is quite specific in what it calls "Old European Cut", and stones need to comply with a number of quantitative criteria regarding table and culet size, steepness of crown and style of pavilion cut, and while I haven't got the measurements with any level of precision your diamond looks a bit more "modern" than GIA's OEC definition would imply. It definitely isn't a modern cut, and many sellers would call it OEC!

If you are interested, here are some technical details - and more importantly photos to compare to your stone to: https://www.gia.edu/gia-news-research-round-brilliant-cut-diamond-pay (the video - although it's a CAD rendering - is quite good in my opinion at illustrating the differences).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most appraisers I think would call that an Old European cut. I even think GIA would, but they're pretty particular. 

Your measurements would indicate about a 1.25ct. but using 2 measurements with 1 significant digit each leaves a lot of room for error.  Even a 0.1mm difference is important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
  • Create New...