henrythomas5788 0 Report post Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) d Edited July 10, 2017 by henrythomas5788 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
denverappraiser 491 Report post Posted July 10, 2017 Awesome, although usually people provide more details. Neil Beaty GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile. Professional Appraisals in Denver Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
henrythomas5788 0 Report post Posted July 10, 2017 cant upload photos and won't let me delete post! sorry! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Furqan Shafi 32 Report post Posted July 10, 2017 Unlikely to affect light performance. Value, yes. Black inclusions in the centre attracts slightly more discounts. The diamond itself is beautiful though. Swanstar Diamonds.http://www.swanstar.com.auMelbourne, Australia. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
denverappraiser 491 Report post Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) I"m just teasing. The admin just did a major upgrade, like yesterday, and one of the things that changed is the way it handles pictures. At least on my screen (Chrome 59.0), there's a 'choose files' link at the bottom of the box where I'm typing and I can upload anything I want. Is that not what you're seeing? What are you using for a browser? Edited July 10, 2017 by denverappraiser Neil Beaty GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile. Professional Appraisals in Denver Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
henrythomas5788 0 Report post Posted July 11, 2017 (edited) "There was a problem processing the uploaded file. -200" But you can see all the details and my questions on here https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/thoughts-on-inclusions-on-this-si1-round-3-4-g.232020/ Thanks and sorry! Edited July 11, 2017 by henrythomas5788 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Furqan Shafi 32 Report post Posted July 11, 2017 I got the link to the stone in my email notification of this post. I have included my comments above. Swanstar Diamonds.http://www.swanstar.com.auMelbourne, Australia. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hermann 16 Report post Posted July 11, 2017 What kind of file were you trying to upload? Hermann Moderator Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
henrythomas5788 0 Report post Posted July 11, 2017 png and jpg tried both - along with chrome and internet explorer "There was a problem processing the uploaded file. -200" - was the error I kept getting I loaded the pictures on that other link Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
denverappraiser 491 Report post Posted July 11, 2017 I think your people on that other forum are being overly harsh. 35.5deg with a 15% crown is just fine. I actually like that look. 41 vs. 40.8 is, quite literally, a rounding issue (GIA rounds pavilion angles to 0.2deg). I also have no problem with the inclusion. It's likely that it'll be eye visible if you know what to look for and where to look, but that's hardly the usual viewing condition and it's the reason SI1's are so popular. For the benefit of others who may want to comment. Here's the stone he's talking about. https://enchanteddiamonds.com/diamonds/view/R340-4096076Z2 Neil Beaty GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile. Professional Appraisals in Denver Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hermann 16 Report post Posted August 22, 2017 Cleaning house today; just a quick update, the issue of uploading images has been fixed. Hermann Moderator Share this post Link to post Share on other sites