davidelevi

A-List Jeweler
  • Content Count

    8139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

515 Excellent

1 Follower

About davidelevi

  • Rank
    Ideal Diamond

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    UK

Recent Profile Visitors

6965 profile views
  1. davidelevi

    Need advice on this diamond D color VVS1 all excellent

    Oh, absolutely, all I'm saying is that photos coming from the same source as the information you want to verify are not verification... unless you trust the source in the first place.
  2. davidelevi

    Need advice on this diamond D color VVS1 all excellent

    BTW, please note that if you don't trust the seller to send you the diamond in the report, whether the photos match or they don't doesn't really matter; I can take photos of a report for a D/VVS1, a D/VVS1 diamond and then send you this: which is an O-P I2.
  3. davidelevi

    Bennett-jewelers on eBay is a total scam and fraud

    Yes, really. Even a year later.
  4. davidelevi

    0.635 ct G SI1 opinion please

    The one at 1 o'clock in the photo is the main cloud (at 9 o'clock in the report plot). The one at 7 o'clock in the photo is its reflection into the pavilion. The stone is rotated by 135 degrees clockwise in the photo vs. the plot. Bear in mind that the photo is taken with an extremely high contrast technique that will highlight most inclusions, and the stone is scrupulously clean (and unset). Once you have that cloud partly hidden by a prong and you are looking at the stone without a loupe (or in a magnified static photo, which is even "worse"), that will be totally invisible.
  5. davidelevi

    0.635 ct G SI1 opinion please

    Nothing strange with that. WF owns the stone, so they are the only ones marketing it. 18-24 months of turnover on a jewellery item of this type are not bad... Which is totally irrelevant at this stage (if it ever was relevant at all) What exactly does that mean? AGS also uses the label "ideal" for its 0(00) cut grade diamonds (and in fact is one of the few if not the only proper definition of "ideal cut" since most others use the term "ideal cut" to mean "I have it in stock and ideally I want you to buy it; I'll cut you a good deal for me on it"). I would say that this is totally eye clean. It's pretty difficult to see the inclusions in the ~20x image, never mind in a non-magnified stone, which is what eye-clean (as opposed to loupe clean) means. Nothing wrong with any of these - but do go out and look at the colour; a video or photos (especially shot with the techniques WF uses on their site) are NOT good proxies for what those look like. In diamonds of this quality and size any I-J tint will only be apparent (if at all) through the side; some people are bothered by it, others love the warmer colour. Final point on budget (that may swing the needle towards the J): remember to add 20% or so VAT...
  6. davidelevi

    Anything will scratch or corrosive to diamond?

    Yes. If the metal is severely abraded to start with (to the point that a diamond set into it is scratched), repolishing may require removal of quite a bit of metal; prongs and bezels are typically quite thin to start with. Platinum will furrow and dislocate in many conditions (rather than scratch and chip away like gold), but it can get gouged away too; rubbing a ring on sand isn't exactly normal usage...
  7. davidelevi

    0.635 ct G SI1 opinion please

    You won't see the difference between this one and an ACA without tools. perfectly reasonable.
  8. davidelevi

    Anything will scratch or corrosive to diamond?

    Be careful - polishing is more abrasion, and bezels or prongs holding the stone may become unsafe.
  9. davidelevi

    Best stone within the given criteria, help!

    Fair enough. I would set aside the issue of lab - in the sense that you are buying a stone, not a piece of paper. The report is relevant to make sure that you are comparing like-for-like, and that you are paying a fair price, but a lab report is not usually providing you with enough information to make a decision. However, I would argue that this deposes against the vendor, not any of the stones. Did you ask people explicitly to help you understand the visual differences between various colours, cut and clarity grades? If you did, and they didn't help, then glean what you can from the presentation, but mark that particular vendor as "unhelpful" and move on to the next one; you can't see too many stones at this stage! Well, the problem is that at the end of the day the subjective impressions are the most important thing. I mean that if you don't know what a J stone looks like and you buy an F because you think "J is going to look yellow", you may well be surprised seeing that a well cut J can actually look very white, especially when seen in isolation. Buying an F buys you insurance in that respect, but it may be insurance that you don't need to buy. I think the point we are trying to make (certainly the point I am trying to make) is that there aren't any all-encompassing, commonly agreed criteria for what to prefer. There is a fair amount of agreement on what to call the various colours and clarities (or at least there is as long as you stick to a good lab: GIA, AGS, HRD, and some IGI among the big names), but that's as far as it goes. Cut - even in rounds - has a lot of variation, and while I have never seen a GIA or AGS "excellent" (or AGS "ideal") look bad, they can and do look very different from each other; which one to prefer between a 53 table and a 61 table, a 33 crown angle or a 36 crown angle and a 40.6 or a 41.0 pavilion - just to stick to stuff that at least you will find on the report - is a personal, subjective call. Those can be useful, but don't expect many vendors to provide them... (and to be honest, I find a comparative, well-shot video in different lighting conditions to be significantly more useful than a reflector image, unless pattern symmetry is one of your main asks!) That's what we are here for - but I don't think you'll find too many people willing to go out and suggest individual stones: those of us that retail will not because we are not allowed to by the forum rules (and good rules they are too) and/or we don't particularly want to push stones that our competition is selling. Those of us (e.g. Neil) that can help you assess stones independently will only do so if you hire them to do it - not least because it wouldn't be fair/professional to recommend one or another diamond without seeing the stone in detail or to endorse one particular vendor vs. another. I think many forum regulars would be more than happy to give you their opinion of a few candidate stones, but even that is going to be limited by the amount of information available and our understanding of what you (your lady) would prefer... Bear in mind that you will pay VAT at the applicable rate no matter where you buy from (unless you import the stone illegally without paying duty and VAT; possible but illegal and risky); the important thing is that you don't compare prices without VAT or duty (0% on loose stones, 2.5% on mounted stones for jewellery coming into the EU) to prices including those taxes and think you are getting a bargain... Yes. But then again their service is a little bit better... and some stones you can get only from them. However if you move to "cut specialists", I would strongly recommend that you consider more sellers than WF, and extend your search to at least a few others. There are plenty of people that can provide top-quality diamonds, but none will do so at a price of an "average" diamond.
  10. davidelevi

    Best stone within the given criteria, help!

    @Wxr4 Neil has provided excellent advice which I could repeat word by word, but it wouldn't be very interesting. So I'll ask a question instead: when you say you wanted what did you have in mind? A conversation about what is important and why? A "how to" guide on diamond shopping? Specific advice on vendors/types? Suggestions on individual stones to consider? All or none of the above? In other words, what is the source of confusion and how can we help? Your post indicates that you have done a fair amount of research, but equally that there may be some misconceptions on "what it's really like", and the one bit of advice from Neil which I will repeat is to go out and look at stones; photos and videos are inadequate substitutes especially for a first-time shopper dealing with unknown vendors.
  11. davidelevi

    Anything will scratch or corrosive to diamond?

    Bear in mind that you can get a softer material to scratch a harder one... the wear rate will be much higher on the soft material, but you can scratch (or more correctly chip) a diamond using steel. Also, high temperatures can affect the appearance, but that's generally minor and can be addressed by repolishing, unless it is causing the stone to shatter or burning it off completely (>~800 °C) .
  12. davidelevi

    Opinions On This Stone Please!

    No bother at all - the forum is here to help. My 2 cents in answer to your questions: 1. If you like the new stone, I think you are being treated fairly on the exchange (even though the attempt of passing off a WGI report as "the same as GIA" was not particularly fair or honest; this said, they were within 1 grade on the clarity, even though it's a big one). 2. A 1 carat G/SI2 is definitely "worth more" than a 1 carat I/I1. Whether what you paid is a fair price is a completely different question. ETA: cross posted with Laurent and Neil. It seems they are significantly harsher than I have been on the jeweller, but in the end I do agree with them: if you want your money back, you should get it. On the other hand, I would still see the proposed new stone as a fairly positive move and as an honest offer to remedy things; whether you want to do so is up to you.
  13. davidelevi

    Opinions On This Stone Please!

    1. Cannot say without seeing the diamond. Generally twinning wisps are quite benign, but if there are many (as in this stone) they could result in an overall "softness"/fuzziness/loss of transparency. The feathers around the girdle and a small indented natural are of no consequence. 2. It depends on a couple of factors, one of which is the visual impact of the inclusions and the other one is the quality of the cut. On the report, we have virtually zero information on either. https://www.diamondreview.com/diamonds?sortOrder=price&sortDesc=1&fShape=Pear&fCaratLo=1.00&fCaratHi=1.10&fColorLo=G&fColorHi=G&fClarityLo=SI2&fClarityHi=SI2&fCutLo=&fCutHi=poor&fDepthLo=50.0&fDepthHi=80.0&fTableLo=0.0&fTableHi=100.0&fSymLo=ideal&fSymHi=vgood&fPolLo=&fPolHi=poor&fCulLo=&fCulHi=vlarge&fFlrLo=none&fFlrHi=faint&fPriceLo=0&fPriceHi=1000000&adv=1 Here are some comparable stones - as you can see, there is nearly a factor of 2 between the top and the bottom...
  14. davidelevi

    Real or fake

    You are starting her off on an expensive path... 😉 Depending on whether her interest is mainly for the "pretty sparkly gem" or whether it's a more serious attitude to understanding minerals and gems from a scientific point of view, you may also want to consider coloured CZ. A small fraction of the cost of diamonds, much clearer and often better cut - and they come in all colours, shapes and sizes (great success for a few weeks with my kids, then they completely forgot about them, but the cost for 30 ct of stuff was $25!)
  15. davidelevi

    Opinions On This Stone Please!

    Advice: 0. Clarify - most importantly to yourself - what actually matters to you and what your priorities and constraints are. 1. No matter what diamond you are considering, choose the vendor first. 2. Don't buy a pear shape diamond for which you have virtually no information regarding shape details and cut 3. Don't buy an SI2 for which you have very little information regarding visibility and impact on transparency of the inclusions 4. Be cautious about thick girdles Opinions: None - there simply isn't enough information on a GIA report to have an opinion on that specific stone... which is why my advice above is phrased in a very very general way. 😉