 |
Our Sponsors
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
Books
|
 |
How to Buy a Diamond by Fred Cuellar
|
This book comes from an industry insider who will tell you all about the business and how
to protect yourself when purchasing diamond jewelry. Highly recommended.
|
| Buy Now |
|
Diamond Ring Buying Guide by Renee Newman
|
The clear illustrations and enlarged pictures of actual diamonds are what add tremendous value to this book. You can
learn to recognize blemishes, inferior cuts, etc., without having to set foot in a jewelry store. Also recommended.
|
| Buy Now |
|
|
|
Ideal
Proportions
In 1919, Marcel Tolkowsky empirically calculated the
ideal proportions of a round diamond as part of his Ph.D. thesis in Mathematics. An
"ideal cut," according to Tolkowsky, has the following characteristics:
Round in shape, and brilliant-cut (58 facets)
Depth percentage: 59%
Table percentage: 53%
Crown height percentage: 16%
Pavilion depth percentage: 43%
Girdle thickness: Medium and even all the way
around the diamond
Symmetry: Perfect
Perfectly aligned and formed facets
Very small or absent culet
It should be obvious that finding a Tolkowsky diamond
is an expensive undertaking. To complicate matters even more, recent studies by the
G.I.A. have demonstrated that a 59% table yields a more brilliant diamond (as opposed to
Tolkowsky's 53% specification). Jewelers tend to confuse the issue even more, since
their version of the "ideal cut" will likely vary from day to day, as their
diamond inventory changes. So how do you, the consumer, go about making the right
decision with regard to cut? What tradeoffs can you make that will yield an almost
ideal-cut diamond? Also, what if you prefer a non-round shape?
Proportions
and Non-Round Shapes
The laws of physics relating to light, as applied by
Tolkowsky, are the same for all shapes of diamonds. When you decide to purchase a
diamond that is not round, you have an inherently asymmetrical diamond, and therefore you
sacrifice brilliance and fire.

The picture above shows the top view of a
princess-cut diamond and two side slices -- one represented by the green diagonal line,
the other by the red horizontal line. Because the diamond is not symmetrical about
its center, it is not possible to create a Tolkowsky cut. If the diamond is cut such
that its horizontal slice has the Tolkowsky depth percentage of 59%, its diagonal slice
will have a depth percentage of 42%. A similar analysis can be done for ovals,
marquises, hearts, and all the other fancy shapes. This is not to say that non-round
cuts are inferior -- a fancy-cut stone can make a beautiful, distinctive engagement
diamond. But the bottom line is that if you want the most sparkly, brilliant diamond
possible, you should buy a round stone.
 |
By now, you should appreciate the importance
of evaluating the proportions of a diamond prior to making a purchase -- "Cut"
is the least understood and perhaps the most important of the 4 Cs. An inferior cut
will yield a lifeless, dull diamond. If you want the most "sparkly" diamond possible, you should
buy a round shape. Because of their inherent asymmetry, non-rounds will not sparkle
as much.
The tables on the next page will summarize the most important
dimensions in each of the popular shapes, along with suggested guidelines. |
|