consumer guidance. we do not sell jewelry.

Jump to content

View New Content      Forum Rules                            New here? Quick site intro

Advice Needed Please On 2.40/f/si1 Round Brilliant Engagement Ring :)


25 replies to this topic

#21 jan

    Ideal Diamond

  • A-List Jeweler
  • 1,790 posts

Posted 30 January 2012 - 07:33 AM

View Postgalatie, on 29 January 2012 - 07:36 PM, said:

Feel like tearing my hair out! Just when I feel like we are ready to buy, one more stone pops up which Iooks like a contender as well. It's still an SI2, but it's 2.11, F, SI2, hearts and arrow ideal cut. The price seems reasonable at $24,780... any thoughts? I am not very familiar with the hearts and arrow type of cut, would it differ from a GIA triple excellent rated stone?


http://www.jamesalle...ond-1315169.asp


There looks to be quite a few inclusions in that stone for about the same price as the 2.03 ct. SI1 G ideal cut diamond with a known 3 very high light performance. The cash price on the 2.03 ct. is $24402.

Hearts and arrows doesn't always mean a top light performance. Personally I would go for sparkle versus an image that you never see again once the stone is mounted. The sparkle and light performance can be seen across the room.
Jan
For those that want to know the truth about diamonds, just ask.

dbof.com

#22 galatie

    Bronze

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 8 posts

Posted 30 January 2012 - 11:39 AM

Hello everyone!!

Thank you all for the advice so far - being that my boyfriend and I know know virtually nothing about diamonds, this has definitelly been a bit of a learning process, and this forum has been very helpful!

As of now, I think that we will go with the 2.31 F SI2 James Allen stone - although the specs of the 2.40 SI1 are better, I think that the extra 8k is a bit out of our budget, and if they appear virtually identical, I think I will like one just as much as the other.

It's really hard to get an idea of size by looking online however. The 2.40 is 8.53 x 8.60 x 5.3. The 2.31 is 8.51 x 8.55 x 5.2. Do you think that the difference in .09 of a carat will be noticable with those dimensions?

Although it is a SI2, I've been told that the 2.31 is eye clean. I have ordered an idealscope image to be sent to me in the next few days - will post when I receive. I figure that if the inclusions do turn out to be noticable, I can return the stone under their 60 day return policy.

Looking forward to finally getting a stone... soon! : )

#23 davidelevi

    Ideal Diamond

  • A-List Jeweler
  • 3,166 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Switzerland

Posted 30 January 2012 - 11:58 AM

The difference in weight is immaterial except to the price. The difference in diameter is 0.035 mm - if you prefer, it's 1.5 thousandth of an inch. And you will not see it under any circumstances without a precision calliper to measure the stones.

Good luck with the purchase, and what follows!

If you could post a photo of the diamond and/or the ring and/or the hand with the ring, we would all be very happy to see it.
Davide - Specialised Consumer Information and Assistance,
Diamonds by Lauren (http://diamondsbylauren.com)
davide@diamondsbylauren.com

#24 galatie

    Bronze

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 8 posts

Posted 30 January 2012 - 03:21 PM

Sorry to be so annoying and ask opinions about so many stones, but here's a new one that just became available on James Allen, and which I've placed on hold. It has a 1.2 HCA. Thoughts on this stone? I think it may be better than the 2.31 F SI2 that we are/were very close to purchasing!!!

[url="http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-SI1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1442302.asp"][url]http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-SI1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1442302.asp[/url][/url]

2.26
F
SI1
table: 56.2%
diameter: 61%
crown: 34.5
pavilion: 40.8
cut: ideal
polish: ideal
symmetry: ideal
girdle: thin to medium
$30,680

I was initially wanted medium to slightly thick girdles - Is thin to medium a problem? Can anyone see any potential problems with this stone?

#25 davidelevi

    Ideal Diamond

  • A-List Jeweler
  • 3,166 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Switzerland

Posted 30 January 2012 - 11:58 PM

Girdle thickness thin to medium is not a problem. What may be a problem is the large, semi-transparent crystal visible at ~10 o'clock in the virtual loupe. It would not bother me (and it is just about visible in the 5x "starting" image) - but does it bother you?

Other than that, you have picked all nicely cut stones - however, they will all look very much alike, so ultimately the decision has to be based on visibility/tolerance of inclusions and price.
Davide - Specialised Consumer Information and Assistance,
Diamonds by Lauren (http://diamondsbylauren.com)
davide@diamondsbylauren.com

#26 galatie

    Bronze

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 8 posts

Posted 31 January 2012 - 02:55 PM

Well, I am pretty certain that we will be going with the last stone, the 2.26 F SI1. I too, was concerned about the crystal, but I've actually had a friend see the stone in person, and it's visible under a 10x loupe, but extremely eye clean to the naked eye.. so I'm confident with this buy!

Now, onto trying to find a setting for it!

Thank you very much for all of your help, will definitely post pics of the final product once everything is done! :) :) :)