I'll give you some clues as to some of the other questions, but you may be really better off asking them to someone who can see the item.
stars133, on 18 September 2011 - 04:21 PM, said:
[snip]
- My thoughts are more focused about the current transaction we're dealing with here... Is this stone really a D, SI1?
Very unlikely that GIA would call it D/SI1. There is a reason why this stone is marketed with EGL papers, and the reason is that the vendor believes it could make more money and/or sell faster this way than with GIA papers. The difference in cost between a GIA report and an EGL one for this stone is about $50, or $100 if the GIA report has to be ordered in addition to a pre-existing EGL report.
Quote
Is it worth the amount we paid?
The problem is that the fair price of the stone depends on its (real, objective) colour and clarity, but also on how easy it is to see the inclusions and how well it is cut - and we have little or no information on that. The most expensive GIA-graded cushions of comparable size, clarity and colour listed for sale on the Diamond Finder are only about 10% more expensive than yours, so I'd say you have paid too much (the most expensive EGL stone is $4600, and it has an EGL-US report which is generally better than EGL-International ones). On the other hand, you are getting a fair price on the setting and higher service levels than by buying from many online vendors.
Would
I buy it at that price? No, I would not.
Quote
Is palladium worth the same as white gold (since the charge is the same)?
Pure Palladium is currently worth about 40% of fine gold, or about 70% of 14K gold. However the majority of the cost in your ring is not the metal but the diamonds and the labour to produce the ring and set the stones. From that point of view, assuming it's well made, it is a very fair price.
Quote
Is the cut of the stone good, fair, or poor?
No way of telling without more information. Do you like it? Does it have any dark, dull spots when you look at it in diffused lighting? Can you see "through" the stone? If the answer to the two last questions is "no", chances are it's cut relatively well.
Quote
How much is this ring really worth?
To whom, and under what conditions? To you and the seller, it's worth $6143, since that's what you agreed to pay. If you were to sell it back to the jeweller, it may be 30-40% of that, and if you were to sell it privately it may be a little more.
Quote
Is the EGL certificate accurate?
Only in terms of the weight. The rest may be correct or may not be.
Quote
Does having an EGL certification vs GIA decrease the value of the stone?
By about $50 - the difference in cost between an EGL and a GIA report. The value of the stone is determined by its real, objective colour, clarity and cut. These don't change based on what report you sell the stone with. A GIA report may make resale easier, and certainly will make comparisons for fair pricing easier.
Quote
I guess I would be asking what is the minimum amount that this ring is worth? (I can't believe I'm being so pessimistic and negative!!)
Again, to whom and under what conditions? To a pawnbroker, it's probably not more than $1000. Retail, assuming worst case, you are looking at about $3300 (price of the lowest 1.0x D/SI1 cushion on the Diamond Finder + $800 for the setting)
Quote
Here's an additional question -- If I go to pick the ring up and have a change of heart regarding the diamond, is it difficult to find a stone to fit an existing setting?
With that type of setting, it won't be easy. The halo has been sized for a stone 6.40 x 5.20 x 3.60 and anything which is more than ~0.2 mm apart on any dimension will require adaptation.
Quote
I'm not sure of the return policies of this store (and there's nothing written on the website or the receipt), but since the setting was custom made because of sizing, what is the usual scenario in these cases for returns?
[snip]
Usual condition for returns on custom-made items is "none allowed", so the setting is yours - at worst to scrap but more hopefully to recycle. The stone is a different question, but the fact that return terms aren't specified anywhere is not a good sign. The store has not described the diamond incorrectly (as far as we know, at least), and is not obliged to take it back. You, on the other hand, are contractually obliged to pay for it at the agreed price.
From best to worst, the possibilities are:
1. They take it back and give you your money back (plus possibly an allowance for the ring, in cash or store vouchers)
2. They take it back and refund your money less a modest restocking fee (5-10%)
3. They take it back for full credit against another stone you like better
4. They offer to keep it for you on consignment, and will give you your money less their commission (20%+) when it's sold
5. They will take it back at "normal" buy-in prices
6. You are stuck with it, because they won't take it back
It would be unusual if they didn't offer you one of the first three options, but it may happen. If after reading this you have changed your mind about keeping the ring, don't pay them the rest of the transaction. You have to, legally, but it gives you much greater leverage. Not nice, I know, but this is life.