Chiminoul, on 03 May 2011 - 09:50 AM, said:
...For free by someone who was given (by me) the report number, not just anyone on the Internet looking at the photos.
Sadly, in this time and era "better safe than sorry". David, thanks for your kind word.
Um, no, my point is that the report contains no confidential information at all, which is why all vendors have no issue in publishing them on their sites. There isn't your name, address or any type of identifying info, nor any way for anyone to trace you from the GIA report number.
What is the point in not disclosing up front to potential buyers everything they can expect to know about the diamond - in a rigorously anonymous fashion?
If what concerns you is the idea that someone may sell something else with a fake GIA report with the same number (not sure why, since there's plenty other numbers available from vendor sites more easily and quickly matching their "fake" stone), you can blank the number out, but still post a scan of the report itself with readable information.
For example, another poster here recently posted about another "Good" cut diamond. It had some characteristics of an older cut (high crown, small table) which could interest me to the point of disregarding the "good" cut grade. Had I been looking for something similar, without seeing the full report, I would simply have ignored the stone.