consumer guidance. we do not sell jewelry.

Jump to content

View New Content      Forum Rules                            New here? Quick site intro

Is Natural on Girdle OK?


5 replies to this topic

#1 cayman

    Newbie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 20 September 2006 - 01:14 PM

Hi, I'm considering purchasing a 1.5 ct pear with a medium girdle--- it has a natural on the girdle that is just barely visible to the naked eye if looking very very closely. I can feel it slightly when I run my fingernail over it. It extends about 1mm into the stone. Other than that, the cut, color, clarity and price are just what I'm looking for.

I'm a novice, and want to understand just what a "natural" means in terms of the stone's integrity--- is it weaker? Will it be more likely to get damaged? What else should I know about natural on the girdle?

Thanks much!
Greg

Pear EGL Europe
1.5 cts. 10.11x6.13x3.92mm
total depth: 63.9%
table 54%
crown 18%
pavilion depth 43%
grdle is medium, faceted

finish and polish are both: good to very good
Color: F
clarity SI2
graining nil
fluor: very slight blue

Set in 14k WG with 2, .20pt each (total .4cts) F, VS trapezoids
Price: $5500

#2 denverappraiser

    Ideal Diamond

  • A-List Appraiser
  • 5,148 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denver Colorado, USA

Posted 20 September 2006 - 03:04 PM

Get it checked out by a pro.

43% depth is extremely small. If this isn't an error, you should move on to a different stone.

A natural is a part of the original crystal surface, as opposed to a facet that the cutter but there. They aren't generally much of a problem but what you are describing is pretty big. Again, get it checked out before you comit to buy.

Neil
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA

There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile.
Professional Appraisals in Denver

#3 cayman

    Newbie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 20 September 2006 - 03:20 PM

Hi Neil,

The total depth is 63.9%

the pavilion is 43%

I do plan to get a a professional appaisal (2 if necessary) but wanted to hear what members on this board have to say.

Thanks, Greg

#4 denverappraiser

    Ideal Diamond

  • A-List Appraiser
  • 5,148 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denver Colorado, USA

Posted 20 September 2006 - 07:59 PM

Greg,

That makes more sense. 63.9% is reasonable. I was sort of suspecting a typo but I guess I just can't read. :D
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA

There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile.
Professional Appraisals in Denver

#5 barry

    Ideal Diamond

  • A-List Jeweler
  • 1,357 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York City Diamond District
  • Interests:Selling Beautiful Diamonds & Jewelery.

Posted 21 September 2006 - 12:59 AM

Naturals are usually not a problem and exist because the cutter needed to retain carat weight, which could be the case here as the diamond weighs 1.5 carat. The price difference between a 1.5 to a 1.49 could range from 5-15% depending on the Cut Quality of the stone.

In view of the fact that this is a SI-2 clarity, the imperfections/inclusions may exist at or around this natural and a key reason the cutter did not polish this area for fear of compromising the structural integrity of the diamond.

Agree with Neil, get this baby checked out by a competent Independent Appraiser.
Barry
www.exceldiamonds.com
www.diamondvues.com
sales@exceldiamonds.com
1-866-829-8600
1-212-921-0635

#6 cayman

    Newbie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 21 September 2006 - 04:41 PM

Big thanks to everyone for your help.

Had 2 GG GIAs from different parts of town look at the stone. I told them nothing about the stone, not even that it is certed. Both came up with "G" possibly H color (of course, it's mounted, so...) both said I1, and both said the natural is smaller than 1mm, and not a vulnerable stone, not an issue.

Another example of EGL Europe ratings being a grade or 2 off on clarity and color....
and I know--- an I1 is worth alot less than SI2. So, now I just decide if the $5500 pricetag is ok....


You all were great! Thanks again!