I hope that someone can help. I feel as if I am being "blinded" per se, with diamonds.
I would appreciate any and all feedback with regards to this diamond.
Report GIA
Shape Round
Carat Weight 1.88
Measurements
Length-to-Width 7.95 x 8.09 x 4.85
Proportions
Depth 56
Table 60
Girdle TN-M
Culet NON
Finish
Polish EX
Symmetry VG
Clarity Grade VS1
Color Grade H
Fluorescence NON
$16,449
Once again, thanks for taking the time to help.
~Jen
0
Tell me what you think.....please :)
Started by Guest_Happy Girl_*, Dec 01 2005 04:24 PM
1 reply to this topic
#2
-
- A-List Appraiser
-
- 5,148 posts
Ideal Diamond
- Gender:Male
- Location:Denver Colorado, USA
Posted 02 December 2005 - 05:36 AM
Jen,
It's probably very pretty. 56% depth is a little bit shallow, which will affect your optics but it's very hard to make a guess about the optics without more information about the cutting. Shallow isn't all bad because it makes them look bigger. Have you seen it and had the opportunity to compare it with other superficially similar stones?
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ISA NAJA
It's probably very pretty. 56% depth is a little bit shallow, which will affect your optics but it's very hard to make a guess about the optics without more information about the cutting. Shallow isn't all bad because it makes them look bigger. Have you seen it and had the opportunity to compare it with other superficially similar stones?
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ISA NAJA
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile.
Professional Appraisals in Denver
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
There's never a crowd when you go that extra mile.
Professional Appraisals in Denver
