I.G.I. CERT. OF AUTHENTICITY (C.O.A.)
Shape/Cut: Round Mod. Brill. Cut*
Measurement: 4.83 - 4.85 x 3.10 MM.
Weight: Est. By Formula 0.45 CT
0.98 TOTAL CARAT WEIGHT
Color: Near Colorless (G-H)
Clarity: SI(1) - SI(2)
Polish/Symmetry: Good/Good
Treatment: None
DESCRIPTION: ONE 14K&PLAT. RING (APPROX. 2.9 DWT.) STAMP "14K PLAT LSC I THE LEO .98", CONT. 3 NAT. DIAMONDS, ROUND MOD BRILL*, EST.TW. 0.98 CTS, 2 AT 0.53 CT.TW. COL: G-H, CLA: SI(1)-SI(2), I SEE ABOVE:
COMMENTS: PREEXISTING INSCRIPTION. "LEO ******". *THE LEO DIAMOND GRADED AS MOUNTING PERMITS. ONE NAT. DIAMOND (NOT GRADED), SET INSIDE THE SHANK. FOR AUTHENTICATION PURPOSES.
INTERNATIONAL GEMOLOGICAL INFORMATION A DIVISION OF INTERNATIONAL GEMOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
PRICE ORIGINALLY LISTED: 3999.00
PAID: 3149.00 BEFORE TAX
Did I pay too much???
Started by cwernham, Jul 13 2005 08:55 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 13 July 2005 - 08:55 PM
#2
Posted 14 July 2005 - 11:21 AM
The problem with IGI appraisals is that they estimate and everything. They estimate the weight, the color, the clarity etc. Just not accurate enough and the lab reports are not as stringent as a stone with a GIA lab report. Sounds like a mall price to me.
Jan
For those that want to know the truth about diamonds, just ask.
dbof.com
For those that want to know the truth about diamonds, just ask.
dbof.com
#3
Posted 14 July 2005 - 07:17 PM
Is that 'mall' price OR a 'small' price??? And if it is a mall price, is that a decent price or did I pay too much???










